Why You Should be Concerned About Machine Performance

by Lloyd Shaw

Why is the stable performance of a Whole Body Vibration unit so important ?

The 4 main reasons for a drop in performance are…

  1. Incorrect or cheap motors.
  2. Incorrect materials used in manufacturing of product.
  3. Electronics.
  4. Just plain cheap everything.

This leads to the following concerns:

Safety

We have discussed in the past our endeavours to develop safety programs based on the Fq’s (frequencies or speed of vibration) we understand to be safe. We’ve also looked at exposure levels attached to workout timetables, based on an ‘every second day’ principle (although not everyone agrees with this approach - some companies still promote the use of their units every day, others 3 times a day).

We have also discussed the importance of keeping away from Fq that may interfere with organ function. These Fq have been well documented in Civil Engineering tests, and by multiple Armed Forces in different countries, and are implemented in ISO regulations. These tests were based on long term exposure in the workplace. We in the industry do not all agree on applying these restrictions to our industry, but one thing in common is ALL programs from ALL companies are based on the particular Fq the manufacture of the machine recommends.

One problem arises though - what if the unit is not achieving the actual or stipulated Fq or speed? This has been documented in the world’s largest selling unit, with variations of +/- 23% from the figure displayed on the control panel of unloaded machines (no-one on board). When someone actually gets on the machine it will vary even more wildly, depending on the persons weight and position on the machine. The same unit was independently tested at universities in NZ and Australia, and was shown to drop almost all performance at only 80kg. Note that this was not a cheap product (at $NZ18,000) - a good indication that the price paid for a unit is not always a pointer to quality.

Quality

Not withstanding the safety issue, quality is really a problem for businesses looking for a machine from which to earn revenue. A drop in performance is a very good indication that the units are indeed not of commercial quality. Some of the machines I have inspected, which are being sold to businesses, are the equivalent of large disposable razors. The limited lifespan is directed at gaining future sales when the manufacturer releases a ‘new model’ every 3 years or so. Not only does your customer not get what they paid for due to lack of performance in your machinery, but you will also pay at some stage again to fix, upgrade, or totally replace machines just to stay in business.

Program Development

This is a simple one, understood straight away by anyone who has trained with any goal in mind. How do you start a program if you do not know where that starting point is?

I will use an engineering term here called the “Theoretical”. This is a base line that never changes, from which to work as a starting point for everything. For example, if you are learning to run 8 miles, the 8 mile distance will never change but your time will. Or, if you are lifting a 100kg bench press, the 100kg will not vary but your reps will. So in these instances your Theoretical is distance or weight.

In Vibration Training platforms, Fq/speed is one of the Theoreticals you use to follow a program (there are others, but this is the simplest one to measure).

If your theoretical was to change without your knowledge, your results would become random and have little meaning. Can you imagine trying to develop a program not having a stable theoretical to work with?

The reason I have used the term “Theoretical” is that this is the language used by engineers when testing the performance of machines. A near perfect machine will follow the “theoretical line” on a graph as closely as is possible. Anything too far off will not pass the testing procedure. This system is used to test a car for road safety (steering, brakes, etc), and anything too far off the line is not road worthy - it fails.

For a trainer to effectively produce a Vibration Training program, they will need to first be assured that the machinery they are working with follows a straight theoretical line in tests. This will at least allow for some form of safety and progress to be maintained and recorded.

Any health or fitness professional serious about purchasing or using a Vibration Training platform should request that engineering reports be done (unloaded, and loaded with varying weight). This will not cost much in comparison with buying a unit and then finding out you have been ripped off.

Ethics

This one is obvious and will not need further explanation. Imagine being put in the position of saying to a customer,

“I am sorry, you are too heavy to go on my weight-loss machine.”

To even produce a unit with such limitations, and with the errors addressed above, must bring into question the dedication and motives of those involved in the manufacture and sale of Vibration Training machines. I am hoping that in the future the industry agrees to regulate itself with pass and fail percentages of available products.

But until then, education is our best defense.

Categories: How it Works, Industry
Written by Lloyd Shaw on June 14th, 2007

40 Comments

Add Comment

Before asking an unrelated question - take a look at the Beginner's Guide to WBV.